辛达雅思代报在此提醒广大考生抓紧时间报名，合理安排自己的考试时间，如对考试的时间、截止日期还有考位的情况不清楚的，如有任何疑问欢迎咨询辛达客服（QQ:4003571 QQ:4005178  旺旺：xindatuofu  电话：13811803490、13811805490、13811806470、13811807490 微信：xindatuofu），雅思代报预祝考生在考试中取得好成绩!

一篇优异的图表作文写作：应该是“意图清晰”，“主题鲜明”，“结构装备得当”的著作。单纯的用数据来填充或是依靠改写词汇是不足以感动考官取得高分的。主张大家从下面的范文和讲解中进行学习，一定会起到事半功倍的作用。

原图请对照Cambridge 8。

小作文：- 图表作文

1. Summarize 写作意图、最主要的信息
2. Make comparisons 归类、

操控好下面的内容：
1、 开篇:清晰指出文章的写作意图
a) 跟着时刻，改变
b) 大小的对比
2、 结束：结合写作意图，清晰的给出图表中最为主要的信息
a) 看改变：哪些目标上升，哪些目标下降，哪些不变
b) 看对比：哪个目标是“最佳王者”
3、 细节分类评论，给出一些支撑定论的依据或进程

分段模式：2+X （2代表开篇和结束；X代表分类的成果和图形的数量）

开篇：
1） 要点要杰出“写作意图”change or compare “C&C”
2） 名词照抄，动词和抽象名词更换，时刻和地址不变，但要杰出“指代”

下面是一篇以描绘对比为主的文章典范：选材

e.g. Cambridge 8 – Test 1

The chart compares the proportions of overgrazing, over-cultivation, deforestation and others. The table compares the percentages of overgrazing, over-cultivation and deforestation in North America, Europe and Oceania during 1990 – 2000. 文章的开篇与提示句不同之处在于：你是在看过图表后发生的详细的描绘。

结束：
Overall, it is clear that overgrazing, over-cultivation and deforestation are main causes of global land degradation, and that the primary causes of land degradation in the three areas were different : North America (Over-cultivation), Europe (Deforestation), and Oceania (Overgrazing), and Europe had the most seriously affected land of the three countries.

中心段：- 分段，每段的主题句怎么支撑最终的定论 X= 2

榜首段：榜首句：最大值， while第二句：挨近的值归类. However, 其他的不主要的值

The most primary cause of land degradation in the world is over-grazing, accounting for 35%, while other two main causes are over-cultivation and deforestation, occupying 28% and 30% respectively. The reminder only takes up 7%.
23% of land in Europe was degraded, which was the most serious, and 9.8% of land degradation was caused by deforestation, as well as 7.7% (over-cultivation) and 5.5% (overgrazing). 13% of land in Oceania was spoiled, and 11.3% of land spoiled was because of over-grazing, while 5% of land was degraded in North America, and 3.3% of the land degradation was subject to over-cultivation.

A complete composition

The chart compares the proportions of overgrazing, over-cultivation, deforestation and others. The table compares the percentages of overgrazing, over-cultivation and deforestation in North America, Europe and Oceania during 1990 – 2000. 文章的开篇与提示句不同之处在于：你是在看过图表后发生的详细的描绘。
The most primary cause of land degradation in the world is over-grazing, accounting for 35%, while other two main causes are over-cultivation and deforestation, occupying 28% and 30% respectively. The reminder only takes up 7%.
23% of land in Europe was degraded, which was the most serious, and 9.8% of land degradation was caused by deforestation, as well as 7.7% (over-cultivation) and 5.5% (overgrazing). 13% of land in Oceania was spoiled, and 11.3% of land spoiled was because of over-grazing, while 5% of land was degraded in North America, and 3.3% of the land degradation was subject to over-cultivation.
Overall, it is clear that overgrazing, over-cultivation and deforestation are main causes of global land degradation, and that the primary causes of land degradation in the three areas were different : North America (Over-cultivation), Europe (Deforestation), and Oceania (Overgrazing), and Europe had the most seriously affected land of the three countries.

下文是一篇以描绘趋势改变为主的范文：资料来自Cambridge 8 Test 2
开篇和结束 – 要点着重写作的意图是：改变；定论要点回答这些目标是怎么改变的。将占份额最大的目标称号，作为非必须内容，写在最初段是为了保持文章的前后一致。
The charts illustrate changes of yearly costs by the school in the Years 1981, 1991 and 2001. In the three years, teachers’ salaries were always the main cost.

Overall, it is clear that the school spent more on teachers’ salaries, furniture and equipment, and insurance, but less on other workers ‘salaries and resources.

中心段：X = 3

A complete composition

The charts illustrate changes of yearly costs by the school in the Years 1981, 1991 and 2001. In the three years, teachers’ salaries were always the main cost.

In 1981, teachers’ salaries accounted for the highest percentage, with 40%. Other workers’ salaries took up 28%, while resources and furniture & equipment did the same percentages, 15%. Insurance was the minimal.
However, during 1981 – 2001 the percentage of teachers’ salaries rose up to 45%, ever peaking at 50% in 1991. That of furniture & equipment also increased to 23%, but reaching the bottom at 5% in 1991, while that of insurance was increasing to 8%.
On the other hand, the percentage of other workers’ salaries was declining to 15%. That of resource also decreased to 9%, though reaching the summit of 20%.
Overall, it is clear that the school spent more on teachers’ salaries, furniture and equipment, and insurance, but less on other workers ‘salaries and resources.