报名日期截止前提醒广大考生抓紧时间报名，如果考位暂满的话可以联系我们代报，欢迎随时咨询在线客服，敬请广大考生注意考试时间.

Some people think animal experiments should be stopped because they are too cruel. Others think they are necessary for the development of 

sciences. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　标题讲评：

　　这类文章想资料当然用我们思考资料四类办法当中的综合法，相加得出观念：动物试验应该继续，可是要尽可能减小动物的苦楚。相应的写四段，大正小

负，当然仍是小的放在前面写。仍是那句话，考IELTS学术类写作想拿高分或许满分永远只要按照English academic writing的规则写英文八股文就成。下面便

和辛达雅思代报小编一同看看：

　　1 最初段(不少于4句);2 有一些动物试验的确cruel(五句);3 可是一些范畴的研讨又不能短少动物试验(七句);4 综合，得出结论(不少于3句)。创作全程使用

IELTS作文cold storage冷处理+assembly line装配法，给自己规则从开始写25分钟内要贴上Google。

　　高分关键词：friends or foes 或敌或友 subject(vt) animals to experimentation拿动物去做试验unjustifiable站不住脚的,不合适的 necessitate 使……成

为必需callous严酷的 confinement 软禁 veterinary 动物医疗 vaccination 接种 vivisection 活体解剖 rodent 指老鼠那一类动物 primate 灵长类 pragmatic 

灵活的追求实效的(pragmatism也是美国人最大的特征)pharmaceutical companies制药公司anthropological and genetic 人类学的和基因学的analgesic, 

anesthetic and tranquilizing drugs医学当中镇痛最常用的三种办法

　　Animals were friends or foes of humanity at different times of the human history. In modern times, experiments upon animals have long been 

a breeding ground for spirited debate. Some animal activists argue that we should ban animal experiments altogether because subjecting animals 

to experimentation is unjustifiable on moral grounds. Yet some other people contend that the advancement of science necessitates animal 

testing. Personally, I believe both their views have merit and demerit.

　　Granted, empirical evidence suggests that many animal experiments are performed callously without any heed to the discomfort or pain that 

laboratory mammals endure. First and foremost, improper confinement of test animals such as locking them up in cramped cages or poor 

veterinary is inhumane .It can gravely disrupt natural biological functions of the test animal. Further, the effects of vaccination and vivisection 

conducted on live rodents, primates and other lab mammals can be gruesome and chilling. They may, in some cases, even constitute sheer 

torture of live animals.

　　However, from a more pragmatic perspective, evidence is mounting that animal experimentation is still largely a necessary evil and there is no

 practical alternative for it at this point. In the first place, it is manifest that drug experimentation on live mammals is far more effectual than 

experimentation on bacteria or on other lower species in testing drug safety. Drugs that have severe potential side effects on homo sapiens must 

be tested by pharmaceutical companies on live mammals first to ascertain their toxicity. In the second place, in space research, live animals are 

still the only viable alternative to humans in testing living creature reaction to outer-space experience on a flight not considered to be sufficiently 

safe for human astronauts. Lastly, lab research about the behavioral tendencies of chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans and other members of the 

primate group is also necessary. It produces valuable outcomes consistently advancing anthropological and genetic studies.

　　To conclude, I concede that experiments upon animals may induce suffering to the test animals. However, I am convinced that there are no 

feasible alternatives to this methodology at the current stage of scientific development. On balance , I think that we should allow animals testing 

to be continued but at the same time use techniques such as analgesic, anesthetic and tranquilizing drugs to minimize the pain inflicted upon the 

test animal and augment the general welfare of these animals.

小编找到的是作者的一些见解，希望可以为考生们寻找到最好得分方式，也希望对大家有所帮助。最后，希望广大考生们在备考过程中提升自己的语言水平，取得更好的成绩。

有需要代报考位的同学们，可以直接联系我们，辛达雅思代报竭诚为您服务。(*^__^*)